Horror Movie Maven

Lover of all things that slash, gash, bleed, and otherwise terrify.

Author: Horror Movie Maven (page 5 of 11)

Eyes Without a Face (1960)

My take: Those French know how to build suspense. It may start slow but it builds wonderfully.

Rating: 3 out of 4 stars

Eyes Without a Face (aka Les yeux sans visage in French) is the story of doctor and a father who will go to any lengths to save his daughter’s face. The daughter, Christiane lost her face in a terrible accident (not quite sure how that happens without losing other major body parts, but it did).

eyes without a face

Since she has no face, Christiane must wear this utterly creepy mask. Bummer for her.

Luckily, her dad is a preeminent professor who specializes in facial transplants and skin grafting. He has not yet perfected his work, however. As a result, there are a few corpses on his path to fixing his daughter’s visage.

The plot is a bit unlikely. But what it lacks in logic, it makes up for in suspense. This film does a great job building the terror throughout the story. And the payoff is definitely worth it.

If you like Diabolique or medical horror stories, then this is for you.

I got it on disc from Netflix. Here’s a good English trailer I found for it on youtube:

Eyes Without a Face also inspired a Billy Idol song of the same name:

Don’t worry. The song has no spoilers that give away the movie plot.

Horror of Dracula (1958)

My take: This is a classic. If it seems riddled with cliches, that is because it was a groundbreaker that everyone copied.

Rating: 3 out of 4 stars

The 1958 version of Dracula, which was released as Horror of Dracula in the United States, is Hammer Horror at its best. This is when the studio was fresh off the heels of Curse of Frankenstein, which was a huge success.

Capitalizing on the success of Frankenstein, this movie has a lot of the same elements. It’s got Peter Cushing playing the erudite  Dr.  Van Helsing (similar to Baron Frankenstein). Christopher Lee as Count Dracula, another classic monster. It’s even got the hot maid from Curse of Frankenstein as a busty bride of Dracula.

Dracula poster

Poster for the 1958 version of Dracula, which was called House of Dracula in the U.S.

But don’t think that this impedes the film. It does not. Instead, the film takes a fresh look at the classic tale and has enough twists throughout to keep you interested. Additionally, Christopher Lee’s Dracula is strikingly different than Bela Lugosi’s monster. Lee is violent and visceral, where Lugosi was aloof and calculated.

I recommend this movie to anyone who likes classic horror, vampire films of the non-sparkly variety, and Hammer Horror films.

I got the movie from Netflix on DVD. Here is the trailer so you can get a sense of it (though the 50’s style voice-over kind of overshadows the trailer a bit):

Macabre (1958)

My take: It’s got an interesting premise but it is drowned out by cheese and confusing twists.

Rating: 1 out of 4 stars

Macabre begins with a voiceover showing a clock and stating this warning:

“Ladies and gentlemen, for the next hour and fifteen minutes, you will be shown things so terrifying that the management of this theater is deeply concerned for your welfare. Therefore,  we request that each of you assume the responsibility of taking care of your neighbor. If anyone near you becomes uncontrollably frightened, will you please notify the management so that medical attention can be rushed to their aid.”

That’s quite the warning. And at first, I was right on board with it because the premise is downright terrifying. The story is about a doctor who returns home to take his three-year-old daughter and secretary out to dinner. But when the secretary , the nanny, and the doctor start looking around the house, they find the girl is missing.

While the doctor is out looking for his girl, the secretary answers the phone where a voice informs her that the girl’s funeral has already taken place, she is in the place of the dead, and there is very little time. The doctor and the secretary immediately fear that the girl has been buried alive.

Macabre

The doctor and his secretary, Polly, searching for a fresh grave where the girl may be buried alive.

It’s a pretty scary start to the movie. But, unfortunately, the story becomes more and more muddled as time passes. It tries to hard to set up a Clue-style mystery where too many suspects could be guilty. It even has an Agatha Christie-style reveal where the culprit is named. Maybe it is just because I have read too many mysteries and watched too much Poirot, but I found this too be utterly cheesy.

I would only recommend this to people who want to watch a corny mystery from the 50s.

I rented it online via Amazon. Here’s a trailer I found on YouTube, that shows what the opening warning was like at the beginning:

The Curse of Frankenstein (1957)

My take: Top-of-the-line Frankenstein story that is now going to be part of my regular rotation of horror films to watch.

Rating: 4 out of 4 stars

I’d heard of Hammer Horror over the years. When you watch a lot of horror movies, you simply can’t avoid it. It crops up in magazines, in documentaries and all over the Internet. But until recently, I had not actually watched a Hammer Horror picture. I knew that Christopher Lee was in them, and I had heard the name Peter Cushing. But I didn’t get it. Now I feel like I do, and I am pissed off at myself for waiting so long to watch one of these.

Curse of Frankenstein

Frankenstein (right) and Paul Krempe (left), his tutor/partner, creating life in The Curse of Frankenstein.

The Curse of Frankenstein is, obviously, about Baron Victor Frankenstein and his creation of a monster. We all know the story. It’s entrenched in our popular culture. As a result, it is very difficult to tell the story and do anything new or interesting with it. Hammer Film Productions made something new and they did it well.

What makes it different? Frankenstein is portrayed as a driven, obsessed man who will go to any lengths to create a human life from nothing. This includes grave robbing, purchasing of black market body parts and even murder. The monster, played by Christopher Lee is realistically grotesque and utterly different from the classic Boris Karloff version of the creature. The story is rich, complex and thought provoking from beginning to end.

If you have not seen this version of the classic monster story of Frankenstein, I recommend that you do. I would recommend this to anyone who like classic horror, monster movies, mad scientist stories and just plain good horror.

I got a copy of the Curse of Frankenstein from Netflix’s DVD service, and it is also available on DVD. Here’s the trailer from when it was released in the late 50s:

Horror Block: December 2014

I waited and I waited for December’s Horror Block to arrive. It finally did, and it did not disappoint. Here is what came this month, for your edification and general jealousy:

Rue Morgue 12/14

The December issue of Rue Morgue so I can learn all of the goings-on in the world of horror.

Zomb Ease hand sanitizer

Hand sanitizer so I can do my part of prevent the zombie apocalypse.

Maggot-Eye Skeleton

A squishy skeleton to help relieve my stress.

Poltergeist Mouse Pad

I don’t need a mouse pad, but if I did, I would want it to look like this.

Creature From the Black Lagoon Pop Toy

A toy version of the Creature From the Black Lagoon. Classic.

And finally, my favorite item in the whole box:

Overlook Hotel T-Shirt

This is my new favorite t-shirt. I might wear it every day.

For those of you who do not know what the Overlook Hotel is, I envy you. That means that you get to watch The Shining for the first time. I would pay a lot of money for that experience, since it currently holds the number one spot in my list of the top 25 horror movies.

As you can see, Horror Block did not let me down. This was the third month receiving things and I continue to enjoy it.

Curse of the Demon (1956)

My take: An interesting tale of witchcraft and demon summoning.

Rating: 2 out of 4 stars

Curse of the Demon, also known as Night of the Demon in the UK, is a pretty basic, run-of-the-mill demonology movie. There’s a cult, a skeptic and a curse.  It’s got a creepy cult leader who reminds me of Charles Laughton in Island of Lost Souls and a bit of Otho in Beetlejuice. There’s a seance and an ancient book that holds evil spells to invoke demons. The story as a whole reminded me of Drag Me to Hell, The Ninth Gate and other demon-summoning stories.

curse of the demon

Demonic cult leader Karswell and his familiar (aka his kitty).

The movie is about an American psychologist/skeptic named John Holdin. Holdin is brought to the UK by Professor Harrington to investigate a new demonic cult. But when Holdin gets to England, he finds Harrington died under mysterious circumstances. As he looks into Harrington’s death, with Harrington’s pretty blonde daughter by his side, he finds that Harrington had been cursed by the cult leader. Now,  the leader of the cult is after Holdin, and Holdin discovers a similar curse has been placed on him.

I would recommend this to anyone who likes a good demonology or satanic cult movie. I rented a copy online via Amazon and it is available from other similar sources. Here’s the trailer:

Don’t be put off by the cheesy looking demon in the trailer. The movie does a good job building suspense in spite of the limits of 1950s effects.

Cannot Find: Ladrón de cadaveres

As I work my way through Studies in Terror, I occasionally fall upon a movie that I simply cannot find. In particular, Mexican horror films seem to be impossible to find in English. Ladron de cadaveres was another Mexican film that I was unable to locate. If you know where I can find a copy of this film with English subtitles, please leave a comment.

ladrón de cadaveres

Poster for the film.

Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)

My take: This film is full of classic science fiction scares. Even if you have seen later versions, this is still a good one to watch.

Rating: 3 out of 4 stars

I know that I’ve seen Invasion of the Body Snatchers before. I think I’d seen the one from the 70s or even the one with the shorter title “Body Snatchers” from 1993. So, I was a bit nervous about seeing an older version from the 1950s. But I was wrong. It still holds up and it is worth watching.

Invasion of the Body Snatchers

Miles and his busty love interest, Becky, flee the alien menace in Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

It does have a few odd features that remind me of a Twilight Zone episode:

  • The story is told as a flashback
  • The main character narrates over the flashback pointing out the mistakes he made and describing his feelings
  • The main character also looks a bit like Rod Serling, with his slicked-back hair, suit and tie (see above)

But even with all of the 1950s stereotypes, it is a solid story that is full of good creepiness.

The story follows Miles, a doctor who returns home after a convention to find the town changed. While he was away, many patients called with urgent ailments that seem to have mysteriously stopped; everyone is suddenly healthy as can be. There are also a slew of townsfolk who believe that their loved ones and relatives are not themselves. A boy runs from his mother, yelling that she is not his mom. A young woman believes that her uncle is not himself because he is devoid of emotion.

The doctor slowly uncovers an alien plot to take over the planet and replace us all with clones. It’s a downright terrifying idea, that is done well even with the limited effects of the 50s. Even having seen later versions with stronger effects, this story still holds up and it is downright creepy to see the clone people developing.

For this reason, I would recommend the 1956 version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers to fans of monster movies, scary science fiction and classic horror.

I watched it online on this site. Here is the trailer on YouTube:

The Face of Frankenstein’s Monster

We have grown so used to the classic visage of Frankenstein’s monster. It’s plastered on Halloween-themed goods every year, and it is so common that we could barely imagine him looking another way.

frankenstein's monster clipart

Clipart of Frankenstein’s monster. Not every image is so iconic that it gets its own clipart.

But the flat-topped skull and neck bolts were once an innovative and entirely new way of presenting the monster from Shelley’s classic tale.

The look for Frankenstein came from a variety of sources. First, was Boris Karloff himself. Karloff’s unique features and wide brow inspired much of the look.

Karloff

Karloff without makeup: the face that inspired a monster.

Second, the makeup was created by Jack Pierce, a master in the art of makeup. He went on to create some of the most famous monsters in the Universal lineup, Bride of Frankenstein and the Wolf Man among them.

According to the book The Horror People, by John Brosnan, Jack Pierce spent weeks preparing for the first makeup test. And he certainly did his research. Pierce said:

“I discovered there are six ways a surgeon can cut the skull, and I figured Dr. Frankenstein, who was not a practicing surgeon, would take the easiest. That is, he would cut the top of the skull straight across like a pot lid, hinge it, pop the brain in, and clamp it tight. That’s the reason I decided to made the Monster’s head square and flat like a box.”

Pierce and Karloff

Jack Pierce (right) doing Karloff’ monster makeup, flat top and all.

Lastly, sources disagree on how heavy a hand director James Whale played in the final makeup design. While Jack Pierce never admitted Whale’s influence, many contend that he played a role in making the monster we know today (source: The Monster Show by David J. Skal).

Regardless, the makeup was certainly effective. The first time he wore it, Boris Karloff ran into a prop man in the hall. Karloff said:

“He was the first man to see the monster — I watched to study his reaction. It was quick to come. He turned white — gurgled — and lunged out of sight down the corridor. Never saw him again. Poor chap, I would have liked to thank him — he was the audience that first made me feel like the monster.” (source:  The Monster Show by David J. Skal)

The frightening look of Frankenstein was so popular and effective, that Universal took great pains to protect its intellectual property in future non-Universal films. When Hammer Films created the Curse of Frankenstein more than 20 years later, Universal threatened to sue if Hammer used any elements that were unique to their movies (source: The Hammer Story: The Authorized History of Hammer Films by Hearn and Barnes). This included Jack Pierce’s famous makeup. This is why subsequent, non-Universal pictures look so different from the monster we expect.

curse of frankenstein

Christopher Lee as the monster in Curse of Frankenstein (1957).

Which is your favorite version of Frankenstein’s monster?

Diabolique (1955)

My take: If you like thrillers of any sort, see this movie. It is a masterpiece of tension, mystery and suspense. Seriously, go see it.

Rating: 4 out of 4 stars

Diabolique is the 34th movie in the book Studies in Terror, and I have been waiting for it. This is because I had seen it before, years ago, and absolutely loved it. On a second viewing, it did not disappoint.

diabolique

The wife and mistress in Diabolique.

It follows the story Christina Delasalle, a young woman with a bad heart who is married to an absolute brute of a man. Her husband, Michel Delasalle, is physically and emotionally abusive. He is also flagrantly unfaithful to Christina. His current mistress is Nicole, a teacher at the school the Delasalles own. Their affair is known to everyone, including Christina, resulting in an uncomfortable triangle of love and hate.

But Nicole is also mistreated by Michel, and this creates a bond between the two women. Working together, they devise a complicated plot to rid themselves of Michel once and for all.

The story moves quickly, keeping a brisk pace throughout. The characters, especially Christina, are so well played and developed, that you are quickly wrapped up in the story. And some scenes are downright cathartic if you like revenge stories. These three elements make it an absolutely fascinating film to watch, and it is one that I know that I will watch many times in the future. It’s that good.

I would recommend this to anyone who likes thrillers, murder mysteries, and suspense. I watched it on Hulu, but you can also get it via disc from Netflix. While you can find the trailer on YouTube, I thought this 3 Reasons video by the Criterion Collection was even better at evoking the feeling of the film:

Older posts Newer posts

© 2024 Horror Movie Maven

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑